In 2015, the editors of the journal Basic and Applied Social Psychology took an unprecedented step regarding statistical reporting. What did they require authors to do instead of reporting traditional null hypothesis tests and p-values?

In 2015, the journal Basic and Applied Social Psychology implemented a controversial change in its reporting standards. Match each aspect of this policy change with its correct description.

A psychologist conducting an experiment on social influence finds that a high-status source changes opinions more than a low-status source ($p = .03$, $d = 0.40$). According to the 2015 reporting standards of the journal Basic and Applied Social Psychology, the researcher is expected to highlight the mean differences and the effect size while omitting the $p$-value from their manuscript.

Analyze the logical progression behind the 2015 decision by the journal Basic and Applied Social Psychology to ban null hypothesis testing. Arrange the following statements in the order that reflects the journal's rationale for shifting the standards of statistical validity.

Following the 2015 ban on null hypothesis testing by the journal 'Basic and Applied Social Psychology', what was the resulting impact on the broader field of psychology?

The 2015 ban on null hypothesis testing by the journal Basic and Applied Social Psychology was intended to shift the focus of psychological research away from binary 'significant vs. non-significant' outcomes and toward the magnitude of effects.

The 2015 ban on null hypothesis testing by the journal Basic and Applied Social Psychology was intended to challenge the field's reliance on binary significance thresholds; instead of using $p$-values, the editors required authors to evaluate the strength and practical importance of their findings primarily by reporting _____.

Dr. Lin is preparing an experimental psychology manuscript for submission to the journal Basic and Applied Social Psychology. Applying the journal's 2015 statistical reporting policy, match each component of Dr. Lin's research findings to the correct submission requirement.

A research team studies a new reading program and finds a tiny difference in reading comprehension scores between the experimental group ($M = 85.2$, $SD = 10.1$) and the control group ($M = 85.5$, $SD = 10.0$) using a massive sample size of $N = 20,000$. Under traditional Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST), this trivial difference is highly statistically significant ($p < .001$) due to extreme statistical power. If the researchers analyze and submit these findings to the journal 'Basic and Applied Social Psychology' under its 2015 reporting ban, they cannot report the $p$-value. In this context, the primary statistical metric they must report to demonstrate that the actual magnitude of this difference is negligible, thereby exposing the lack of practical significance, is the _________.

Imagine you are a peer reviewer evaluating a research manuscript submitted to the journal Basic and Applied Social Psychology. To rigorously evaluate the statistical validity of the findings in accordance with the journal's 2015 reporting standards, you must prioritize the statistical evidence and filter out unacceptable practices. Arrange the following evaluation steps in the correct order, from the first, most fundamental step of data examination to the final step of identifying and rejecting banned inferential statistics.