Palayew et al.'s PubMed Comparison of COVID-19, Ebola, and Cardiovascular Disease Articles
Palayew et al. used single-query PubMed searches to compare journal articles about COVID-19, Ebola, and cardiovascular diseases. For COVID-19 and Ebola, they examined articles published during the first 12 weeks after each disease was declared a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC). The median acceptance time was 6 days for COVID-19 articles and 15 days for Ebola articles.
0
0
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
Gail Carson tweets a call to action for responsible communication of scientific research
Dr. Sylvie Briand tweets about a WHO conference explaining infodemiology during the pandemic
New York Times article explains how COVID-19's silent spread was so ignored
Study done on COVID-19 publications: Database coverage, citations, readers, tweets, news, Facebook walls, Reddit posts
Xihong Lin tweets about Rt data map that helps organize information by location
Andreas Steinmayr tweets about the massive number of COVID papers being published
Ludo Waltman tweets about changes in communication technology/methods of researchers as a result of COVID
World Fed. of Science Journalists tweets about rapidly expanding COVID literature
Ezequiel Ferrero posts comically tweets about how COVID papers are becoming noise
Parveen Kaswan tweets about how there is no cure to the growing number of papers being published
Research Gate tweets about problems exacerbated by COVID that researchers are facing in collaborative research
Article on the launch of EU data portal to support and accelerate COVID-19 research
Research Gate tweets about the Research Gate community helping curate papers for COVID-19 researchers
Article on the role AI and machine learning are playing to fight COVID-19
Jim Morrissey tweets that he and his co-editor receive great papers about COVID and denounces that the JTH Journal is not overcrowded by COVID papers
Nature posts article on how preprint servers block bad COVID research
Joanna Shields tweets that it is humanly impossible to review over 68,000 papers and abstracts on COVID-19. Believes that AI can help parse through these papers.
The Economist tweets about an article about the HXC scandal of bad peer review and faulty publishings
Martin Cohn tweets about his recent paper on doug fords COVID contradictions
The rapid politicization of the COVID-19 pandemic can be seen in messages members of the U.S. Congress sent about the issue on t Twitter, according to a new analysis.
UMN School of Public Health tweets about an article about not having a national consensus on state policy
Alex Sundermann tweets about an article about no universal agreement on airborne transmission
Nature tweets about how scientists are fighting back against COVID-19 misinformation
Longitudinal Relationship Between Social Media Activity and Article Citations in the Journal Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
University of Oxford Systematic Review on Face Masks and Coverings
Jason Sheltzer tweets about a randomized trial showing tweeted papers get more citations
SMaRTeN Survey on COVID-19's Impact on Doctoral and Early-Career Researchers
Palayew et al.'s PubMed Comparison of COVID-19, Ebola, and Cardiovascular Disease Articles
Carlos Cuello-Garcia's tweet introducing a commentary on social media during COVID-19
Learn After
Recommendation 1: Palayew et al.
Recommendation 2: Palayew et al.
Recommendation 4: Palayew et al.
Palayew et al. note the risk of bias in curated databases and suggest multiple independent QA systems
Palayew et al. raise concerns about “duplication of reviews”
Palayew et al.'s Concerns Regarding COVID-19 Evidence Quality and Misinformation
Palayew et al.'s Examples of COVID-19 Literature Synthesis Databases
Palayew et al.'s Recommendation to Prioritize Funding for Literature Databases
Palayew et al.'s Recommendation to Commission More Reviews Synthesizing COVID-19 Evidence