Learn Before
Multiple Choice

A peer review board is evaluating a study submitted by a clinical psychologist who used a single-subject design to measure the effectiveness of a novel behavioral intervention on a specific patient. A reviewer argues that the study is fundamentally flawed because it fails to demonstrate whether the intervention would create a small, incremental benefit for the general population. Based on the unique strengths of single-subject research, what is the most scientifically sound evaluation of the reviewer's argument?

0

1

Updated 2026-06-07

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related