Learn Before
Short Answer

A researcher studying a new reading program expects it to improve reading speed. When administering the reading speed test, the researcher unintentionally gives the experimental group slightly more time to complete the task. Briefly apply the concept of the experimenter expectancy effect to explain why this action occurs and how it affects the study's validity.

Question: A researcher studying a new reading program expects it to improve reading speed. When administering the reading speed test, the researcher unintentionally gives the experimental group slightly more time to complete the task. Briefly apply the concept of the experimenter expectancy effect to explain why this action occurs and how it affects the study's validity.

Sample answer: This action occurs because the researcher's own expectation about the reading program's success subtly and inadvertently biased their behavior during the administration of the measure. By giving the experimental group more time, the researcher systematically altered participant performance, which compromises the study's validity by introducing bias.

Key points:

  • Researcher expectation causing inadvertent behavior during measure administration
  • Unintended bias altering participant responses or performance
  • Compromised validity of the study

Rubric: Grading Rubric: - 4 points: Applies the concept by identifying that the researcher's expectation caused the inadvertent behavior (giving more time). - 3 points: Connects the extra time to a systematic alteration of the participants' behaviors or responses. - 3 points: Clearly states that the study's validity is compromised.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-27

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related