Short Answer

A researcher's planned hypothesis test yields a non-significant result (p>.05p > .05). They decide to conduct an exploratory post-hoc analysis and discover a surprising, statistically significant relationship between two other variables. Write a brief statement (1-3 sentences) that the researcher could include in their discussion section to report this finding in accordance with responsible scientific practices.

Question: A researcher's planned hypothesis test yields a non-significant result (p>.05p > .05). They decide to conduct an exploratory post-hoc analysis and discover a surprising, statistically significant relationship between two other variables. Write a brief statement (1-3 sentences) that the researcher could include in their discussion section to report this finding in accordance with responsible scientific practices.

Sample answer: In addition to our planned analyses, an exploratory analysis revealed an unexpected significant relationship between the variables. While this finding suggests a relationship that may be worthy of additional research, it must be treated with caution and replicated in subsequent studies.

Key points:

  • Explicitly label the analysis/finding as exploratory or unexpected.
  • Describe the relationship as potentially worthy of additional research.
  • Acknowledge the need for caution and replication in future studies.

Rubric: The response must be 1-3 sentences long and include: 1) A clear label of the analysis or finding as exploratory or unexpected. 2) A statement explaining that the relationship is worthy of additional research. 3) An acknowledgement that the finding must be treated with caution or replicated in future studies.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-26

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related