Learn Before
Case Study

Based on the principles of hypothesis testing, explain whether the lead researcher's suggestion to use a one-tailed tt-test in this scenario is appropriate.

Case context: A research team is investigating whether a new cognitive behavioral therapy affects anxiety scores. They did not formulate a directional hypothesis beforehand. However, after collecting the data and looking at the means, they notice the therapy group's anxiety scores are substantially lower than the control group's scores. Excited by this finding, the lead researcher suggests running a one-tailed tt-test to maximize their chances of finding a statistically significant result, noting that the entire extreme 5%5\% of the probability distribution would be placed in the direction of the observed difference.

Question: Based on the principles of hypothesis testing, explain whether the lead researcher's suggestion to use a one-tailed tt-test in this scenario is appropriate.

Sample answer: The lead researcher's suggestion is not appropriate. A one-tailed tt-test evaluates differences in a specific, pre-determined direction and is only appropriate when researchers have a strong theoretical justification to expect the difference prior to data collection. Deciding to use a one-tailed test after observing the data violates this requirement.

Key points:

  • The suggestion to use a one-tailed tt-test is inappropriate
  • One-tailed tests require strong theoretical justification prior to data collection
  • Looking at the data before deciding on a one-tailed test violates the requirement of pre-determined direction

Rubric: The response must correctly diagnose the suggestion as inappropriate and explain that directional expectations must be justified theoretically prior to data collection, rather than being based on an observation of the data after the fact.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-27

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related