Example: Determining that the Relation is Not a Function
Consider the relation defined by the set of ordered pairs: . To determine if this relation is a mathematical function, inspect the first coordinates. The -value is paired with both and , the -value is paired with both and , and the -value is paired with both and . Because single -values correspond to multiple -values, this relation is not a function. The domain is , and the range is .
0
1
Tags
OpenStax
Intermediate Algebra @ OpenStax
Ch.3 Graphs and Functions - Intermediate Algebra @ OpenStax
Algebra
Related
Example: Determining if the Relation is a Function
Example: Determining that the Relation is Not a Function
At a logistics company, a software system records package deliveries as a set of ordered pairs. The first coordinate () represents a unique package tracking ID, and the second coordinate () represents the assigned delivery zone. According to the mathematical definition, what must be true about this set of ordered pairs for it to be considered a function?
A warehouse management system uses a set of ordered pairs to map unique Item Barcodes () to their assigned Storage Bins (). To satisfy the mathematical definition of a function, each unique Item Barcode must correspond to exactly ____ Storage Bin(s).
In a professional data management system, relations are often represented as sets of ordered pairs . True or False: If a single -value is associated with two or more different -values, the relation is NOT considered a mathematical function.
In a logistics department, a database tracks the relationship between Package Tracking IDs () and assigned Delivery Trucks () as sets of ordered pairs. Match each set of ordered pairs with the correct description of its status as a mathematical function.
Defining Function Criteria for Data Relations
A data technician at a local medical clinic is reviewing a registry database of patient registrations. The registry records these registrations as a set of ordered pairs , where the first coordinate represents the Patient ID and the second coordinate represents the Assigned Doctor ID. To ensure database integrity, the technician must recall the standard procedure to verify if this relation represents a mathematical function.
Arrange the steps below in the correct logical sequence to describe the standard procedure for determining whether a set of ordered pairs is a function.
Explaining the Rule for Functions in Data Logging
Learn After
A logistics coordinator at a distribution center is reviewing a data log that maps specific loading dock numbers to the temperature variations recorded at those docks. The log contains the following relation of (dock number, temperature variation) pairs: . Recalling the mathematical definition of a function, why does this data log fail to represent a function?
In a warehouse inventory database, a technician finds the following relation of (Shelf ID, Bin ID) pairs: . To confirm that this relation is not a function, the technician notes that the input Shelf ID 4 is paired with two different Bin IDs: -2 and ____.
A logistics coordinator tracks the relationship between 'Warehouse Zone IDs' () and 'Daily Stock Adjustments' () using the following relation: . True or False: According to the mathematical definition of a function, this relation represents a function.
A systems analyst is auditing a data log that maps 'Department IDs' () to 'Access Authorization Codes' (). The relation is defined as: . To verify if this mapping represents a mathematical function, match each Department ID () with the correct observation regarding its paired Authorization Codes ().
Maintenance Log Audit: Data Consistency
At a regional package delivery hub, a data assistant is auditing an automated log that maps daily delivery route IDs () to driver performance score adjustments (). The log contains the following relation: . To verify why this logged relation does not represent a mathematically consistent function, arrange the logical steps of the audit process in the correct order, starting from the initial inspection to the final conclusion.
Case Study: Fulfillment Center System Log Audit