Learn Before
Imagine you are an ethics board member reviewing a new proposal that plans to secretly observe people in a public setting where privacy is expected. If the researcher attempts to use the exact same procedural defense as Middlemist and colleagues used in their 1976 study, what specific action would the researcher propose doing prior to the main observation to justify the study?
Question: Imagine you are an ethics board member reviewing a new proposal that plans to secretly observe people in a public setting where privacy is expected. If the researcher attempts to use the exact same procedural defense as Middlemist and colleagues used in their 1976 study, what specific action would the researcher propose doing prior to the main observation to justify the study?
Sample answer: The researcher would propose conducting preliminary interviews to demonstrate that potential participants would not be bothered by the secret observation, and argue that they carefully weighed the tradeoffs.
Key points:
- Conducting preliminary interviews.
- Using these interviews to show participants are not bothered by the observation.
- Asserting that the researchers carefully weighed the tradeoffs of conducting the study.
Feedback: The correct answer must identify the use of preliminary interviews to check if participants are bothered, as well as the weighing of tradeoffs, mirroring the defense used in the Middlemist study.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
What was the primary method used by researchers in Middlemist, Knowles, and Matter's 1976 study on 'personal space' that led to ethical criticisms regarding privacy?
Imagine you are designing a study to secretly observe behavior in a public cafeteria. To apply the ethical reasoning used by Middlemist and colleagues in their 1976 personal space study, you should conduct interviews with potential participants beforehand to assess whether the target population would likely perceive the observation as an invasion of privacy. True or False?
Arrange the logical steps used by Middlemist and colleagues in their 1976 study to defend the ethical validity of using covert observation in a public restroom.
Suppose you are developing a research proposal for a new study on social interaction in a public locker room. To synthesize an ethical defense that specifically replicates the logic used in the Middlemist's Personal Space Study, which of the following plans should you incorporate into your design?
In Middlemist, Knowles, and Matter's 1976 personal space study, the dependent variable measured by covert observers was the time it took for men to begin urinating after approaching a urinal.
In psychological research, Middlemist's 1976 personal space study is frequently discussed because it represents a clear ethical dilemma. Which of the following statements best explains why this study illustrates an 'unavoidable ethical conflict'?
Critics evaluating the ethicality of the Middlemist personal space study argue that the scientific importance of the data collected provides an insufficient _____ for the secret observation of participants in a restroom, as the method itself is seen as an inherent violation of human dignity.
Middlemist's 1976 personal-space study is a classic example of an unavoidable ethical conflict in psychological research. Match each element of the debate to the reasoning or principle it represents.
Match each element of the Middlemist personal space study to the methodological role or ethical argument it represents.
When researchers defend a covert observation study by arguing that preliminary interviews showed participants were not bothered, while critics judge the study as an unjustified violation of privacy, the case demonstrates that well-meaning researchers can strongly disagree on how to resolve an unavoidable ethical _____.
Describe the methodology and the specific variables measured in Middlemist, Knowles, and Matter's 1976 study on personal space. Furthermore, state the primary argument used by the researchers to defend their covert observation against ethical criticisms.
Based on this scenario, explain how this study illustrates the concept of an 'unavoidable ethical conflict' in psychological research. What two valid but opposing perspectives are in tension here that researchers must evaluate?
Imagine you are an ethics board member reviewing a new proposal that plans to secretly observe people in a public setting where privacy is expected. If the researcher attempts to use the exact same procedural defense as Middlemist and colleagues used in their 1976 study, what specific action would the researcher propose doing prior to the main observation to justify the study?