Kareem Carr's Example of Constructive Scientist-to-Scientist Debate
Kareem Carr describes scientist-to-scientist debate as a collegial search for the right answer. Even when disagreement becomes heated, participants can rely on their scientific community's standards of behavior to keep the discussion productive.
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
James Todaros tweet about not finding a consensus on the IFR and current WHO estimates
Roberto Rocha has a twitter thread on the conversation between scientists on finding a consensus about covid-19
Dr.Saskia Popescu tweets about the conversation surrounding what airborne actually means in the context of COVID-19
Geoffrey Siwo tweets about crowdsourced COVID-19 gene library that helps reach consensus
Research Knowledge Sharing During a Pandemic: A Call to Action
Misinterpretation of Scientific Critiques on Evidence Sufficiency
Kareem Carr on Science Communication Mistakes Among Scientists
Lack of Data Transparency in COVID-19 Research
Public Confusion from Decentralized Expert Messaging on Social Media
Adversarial Postures Towards the WHO as a Barrier to Scientific Consensus
Chris von Csefalvay's Twitter Thread on Harmful Attitudes Toward Epidemiologists Distracting from COVID-19 Insights
Soragni Lab's Critique of COVID-19 Proposals from Researchers Without Relevant Expertise
Kareem Carr's Example of Constructive Scientist-to-Scientist Debate