Case Study

Prioritizing fixes for an image classifier error

Case context: You are building a classifier. You gather a sample of 100 dev set examples that your system misclassified. During manual error analysis, you count that 60% of these misclassified examples are dog images, whereas only 5% of them are cat images.

Question: Based on the manual review of these 100 examples, which type of error should you prioritize fixing, and how does the error analysis justify this decision?

Sample answer: You should prioritize fixing dog image misclassifications. The manual error analysis shows that dog images account for 60% of the error sample, while cat images account for only 5%. Prioritizing the dog category offers a significantly larger potential reduction in the overall error rate.

Key points:

  • Identify dog images as the largest category of error (60% vs 5% for cats)
  • Choose to prioritize dog images for fixing
  • Ground the decision in the manual error analysis counts

Rubric: The answer must identify dog images as the priority category and justify this choice by pointing out that they account for a much higher fraction (60%) of the errors in the manual sample of 100 misclassified examples compared to cats (5%).

0

1

Updated 2026-06-17

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

Machine Learning

Deep Learning

Supervised Learning

Dive into Deep Learning @ D2L

Data Science

Machine Learning Strategy

Machine Learning Yearning @ DeepLearning.AI