Learn Before
Statistical Significance in Psychology
In psychological research, a finding is typically considered 'statistically significant' if there is a probability of five percent or less that the observed difference between groups occurred by random chance. This standard helps researchers confidently conclude that the results are meaningful and not just a fluke.
0
1
Tags
Ch.2 Psychological Research - Psychology @ OpenStax
Psychology @ OpenStax
Introduction to Psychology @ OpenStax Course
OpenStax
OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Statistical Significance in Psychology
Example of Evaluating Experimental Effectiveness
A researcher conducts an experiment to test a new study technique. The group using the new technique scores an average of 88% on a test, while the control group using a traditional technique scores an average of 85%. Based solely on these averages, the researcher concludes the new technique is superior. What is the primary flaw in the researcher's reasoning?
A psychologist conducts an experiment to test a new therapy designed to reduce public speaking anxiety. The experimental group receives the new therapy and has an average anxiety score of 45 (lower is better). The control group receives no therapy and has an average anxiety score of 50. After collecting this data, the psychologist performs a statistical analysis. What is the primary question this analysis seeks to answer?
Inferential Statistics
Learn After
Limiting False Positives in Research
Example of a Non-Significant Result: Nutritional Supplement
Criticisms of Null Hypothesis Testing
In psychological research, a finding is typically considered 'statistically significant' if the probability that the observed difference occurred by random chance is:
According to the standard criteria in psychology research, a result with a 10% probability of occurring by random chance would be classified as statistically significant.
A team of researchers has completed four separate psychological studies. Match each study's calculated p-value to the correct interpretation of its statistical significance based on the standard 5% threshold.
A researcher is evaluating the strength of evidence provided by four separate studies. Arrange these findings in order from the highest level of confidence to the lowest level of confidence that the observed result represents a meaningful effect rather than random chance, based on the standard threshold for statistical significance in psychology.
Match each term related to the standard of statistical significance in psychology with its correct description according to the course definition.
In psychological research, what does it mean to conclude that a finding is 'statistically significant' at the standard level?
A researcher finds that a treatment group performed better than a control group, with a probability of that the result was due to random chance. Since this meets the standard threshold for significance, the researcher concludes that the findings are _____ rather than a fluke.
A neuropsychologist compares reaction times between two groups and finds a difference. Statistical analysis shows there is a probability that this difference occurred by random chance. According to standard criteria in psychological research, this finding should be classified as statistically significant.
A psychologist conducting an experiment on learning techniques must analyze their data to determine if the difference in test scores between two groups is statistically significant. Arrange the steps of this analytical process in the correct logical and chronological order, starting with the baseline assumption and ending with the final research conclusion.
An educational psychologist peer-reviews a manuscript investigating a new study tool. The manuscript's authors found that students using the tool scored higher than those who did not, with a calculated probability of (or ) that the difference was due to random chance. The authors conclude that their tool's benefits are statistically significant. When evaluating this claim against the standard threshold for statistical significance in psychological research, the peer reviewer should judge the authors' conclusion to be _______ (justified/unjustified).