Statistically Significant
A finding is considered statistically significant when it is highly unlikely to have occurred due to random chance alone. In the context of inferential statistics, achieving statistical significance suggests that the results represent a genuine, real effect within the broader population.
0
2
Tags
Clinical Practice of Psychology
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook
Related
Is it a statistical significance always a practical significance?
Statistically Significant
Probabilistic Nature of Statistics
Confidence Interval
Statistically Significant
Type I Error
Type II Error
Mehl's Study on Sex Differences in Talkativeness
Kanner's Study on Daily Hassles and Symptoms
Null Hypothesis Testing
What is the primary purpose of using inferential statistics in psychological research?
A clinical psychologist evaluating a new cognitive therapy on 50 patients uses inferential statistics to determine whether the observed reduction in anxiety symptoms is likely to apply to all patients with the disorder.
Arrange the steps of the scientific process to show how researchers use statistics to move from observing a specific group of participants to making a broad conclusion.
A researcher conducts a study and finds that students who use a specific mnemonic technique remember 10 more words on average than a control group. Match each component of their inferential statistical analysis to the logical role it plays in determining if this result is 'real.'
A researcher finds that a specific group of participants improved their memory scores after a treatment. To evaluate whether this improvement represents a genuine effect rather than a product of random chance, the researcher must use ________ statistics.
Suppose you are designing a new statistical software package specifically for psychological research. You need to create a module for 'inferential statistics' that allows researchers to determine if their sample findings are likely to be true of the broader population. Which of the following features would you need to build to ensure the module performs this core function?
Match each statistical term with the definition that best describes its role in psychological research.
In psychological research, the primary function of inferential statistics is to determine whether the results observed in a study's sample are likely to reflect a genuine relationship in the broader population, rather than occurring simply due to random chance.
A psychologist finds that a treatment group scored higher on a memory task than a control group. To analyze whether this difference is merely a product of random chance or if it represents a genuine effect, the psychologist must transition from descriptive summaries to using _____.
Evaluate the logical process of analyzing research findings. Order the steps a researcher must take to transition systematically from examining raw sample data to updating their theoretical framework.
Define inferential statistics and recall their primary purpose in psychological research. How does this purpose contrast with that of descriptive statistics, and how does it relate to the evaluation of theories?
Explain why descriptive statistics alone are insufficient for the researcher to draw this conclusion about the broader population. What is the role of inferential statistics in resolving this issue?
A research team finds a correlation of between study hours and exam grades in their sample. Apply the concept of inferential statistics to explain what this technique will tell the team about their finding in relation to the broader student population.
Learn After
Probabilistic Nature of Statistics
Trade-off Between Sample Size and Relationship Strength
Practical Significance
In the context of inferential statistics, what does it mean when a research finding is described as statistically significant?
In psychological research, if a finding is described as statistically significant, it implies that the observed effect is likely to be a genuine phenomenon rather than a product of random variation.
A psychological researcher is evaluating the results of several different studies. Match each specific research scenario with the correct statistical interpretation regarding significance and the nature of the findings.
A psychologist is evaluating whether a new study on social interaction reveals a real phenomenon or just a fluke. Arrange the logical stages of the researcher's analytical process to correctly conclude that a finding is statistically significant.
Match each term related to the interpretation of research results with its correct defining characteristic.
Example of Sample Size and Relationship Strength
A researcher reports that a new study-skills training program led to a statistically significant increase in exam scores compared to a control group. What does it mean for this finding to be 'statistically significant'?
A researcher claims that a research finding is 'proven' because the probability of the results occurring by random chance alone is only . A peer reviewer evaluates this claim and suggests a more scientifically accurate term, noting that the finding should instead be described as _____ to indicate that it is highly unlikely to have occurred due to random variation while avoiding the overstatement of absolute proof.
A developmental psychologist observes that infants in a structured play group share toys more often than those in an unstructured group. However, her statistical analysis reveals that this observed difference could easily occur due to random chance alone. Based on this result, the psychologist should report her finding as statistically significant.
A cognitive psychologist compares two problem-solving strategies and observes that participants using Strategy X completed tasks faster than those using Strategy Y. After applying inferential statistics, the psychologist declares the performance difference to be 'statistically significant.' Analytically, what does this specific declaration logically conclude about the relationship between the observed data and the broader population?
A developmental psychologist tests a novel reading intervention on a sample of elementary school students. The intervention group scores higher on a reading comprehension test than the control group. The psychologist runs an inferential statistical analysis, finds the difference to be statistically significant, and writes in her report: 'This statistically significant result definitively proves that our intervention works perfectly, meaning we can guarantee every student in the broader population will see reading improvements, with zero possibility that random chance influenced our data.' As a peer reviewer evaluating this report, which of the following is the most accurate critique of the psychologist's statement based on the concept of statistical significance?