Learn Before
Unsuitability of Wikipedia for Scientific Research
Despite containing valuable information, Wikipedia is not considered a reliable foundation for sound scientific research. It is unsuitable because its content can be continually altered, and its authors are anonymous individuals who are not guaranteed to have any formal academic training or subject-matter expertise.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Unsuitability of Wikipedia for Scientific Research
What is a defining characteristic of non-scholarly sources that makes them unreliable for academic research?
An encyclopedia entry summarizing a psychological disorder is considered a valid scholarly source for a research paper because encyclopedias are fact-checked and widely used for educational purposes.
Identify the primary reason each of the following sources is classified as 'non-scholarly' for a psychology research project by matching the source scenario to its specific limitation.
A student is evaluating several types of information for a psychology literature review. Arrange these sources in order from most rigorous (standard scholarly literature) to least rigorous (non-scholarly), based on their intended audience, vetting process, and the basis of their claims.
Which of the following is categorized as a non-scholarly source and is typically excluded from the scientific research literature in psychology?
Match each attribute of a non-scholarly source to the characteristic that excludes it from the formal scientific research literature in psychology.
When evaluating the academic suitability of a 'pop psychology' publication, a researcher rejects the source because its claims are typically based on personal experience rather than _____ data.
A student drafting a literature review on anxiety decides to exclude a self-help book written by a licensed therapist, even though it contains clinical recommendations, because it has not been reviewed by other researchers. This decision correctly applies the criteria for identifying non-scholarly sources.
A researcher analyzing a general website on psychology notes that, unlike scholarly sources, it is excluded from the scientific research literature primarily because it does not undergo _____.
A researcher needs to evaluate whether a newly published psychology website is suitable for an academic literature review. Order the evaluation steps from the initial audience check to the final classification.
List three examples of non-scholarly sources and state the two primary reasons why they are considered unreliable for academic psychology research.
Based on the distinction between scholarly and non-scholarly sources, explain why the student should not use this self-help book for their academic research paper. Discuss the intended audience of the book and the methodological basis of its claims.
You are gathering literature for a research project on childhood development and come across an entry in a general online encyclopedia. Briefly explain what you should do with this source regarding your scientific literature review and justify your decision.
Learn After
When conducting a literature review for a psychological study, what is the primary reason Wikipedia is considered an unsuitable foundation for scientific research?
Wikipedia is considered an unsuitable foundation for scientific research in psychology because its content lacks stability over time and its anonymous contributors are not required to have verified subject-matter expertise.
A student is evaluating a Wikipedia entry for a literature review in a psychology course. Match each specific observation about the Wikipedia entry with the primary reason it is considered an unsuitable foundation for scientific research.
A researcher is evaluating why a Wikipedia entry is an unsuitable foundation for a scientific psychology study. Arrange the logical steps of this analysis in the correct order, starting from the identification of the source's features and leading to the final methodological conclusion.
A psychology student is drafting a research proposal and wants to use a Wikipedia article as a foundational source for their literature review. Which statement best explains why this source is considered an unsuitable foundation for sound scientific research?
Although Wikipedia contains valuable information, it is not considered a reliable foundation for sound scientific research in psychology because its content can be continually altered and its contributors are _____ individuals who are not guaranteed to have any formal academic training or subject-matter expertise.
When evaluating the rigor of a scientific paper, a peer reviewer flags the use of Wikipedia as a primary source for theoretical definitions. The reviewer concludes that Wikipedia is an unsuitable foundation for research because it lacks _____, since its open-editing model allows anonymous individuals without verified subject-matter expertise to alter its content at any time.
A student is designing a psychology experiment on sleep deprivation and discovers a comprehensive Wikipedia article summarizing recent findings. The student decides to use this article as the primary foundation for their research hypothesis and cites it directly in their paper. Applying the standards of scientific research, why is citing this source problematic for the study's foundation?
A psychology student is analyzing why an instructor rejected their use of a Wikipedia article as the foundation for a research study. Match each structural feature of Wikipedia to the specific methodological vulnerability it introduces into the scientific research process.
A psychology student argues that a Wikipedia article on clinical depression is a reliable foundation for a research paper because they personally verified that its current information matches several peer-reviewed journals. According to the standards of scientific research, this verification makes the Wikipedia article a suitable foundational source.