A researcher notices that a newly implemented visual task is causing participants unexpected eye strain and severe headaches. How should the researcher apply ethical guidelines regarding unanticipated reactions to address this specific issue?
Question: A researcher notices that a newly implemented visual task is causing participants unexpected eye strain and severe headaches. How should the researcher apply ethical guidelines regarding unanticipated reactions to address this specific issue?
Sample answer: The researcher must apply ethical guidelines by seeking feedback from the affected participants during debriefing about their headaches and immediately adjusting the visual task procedures to eliminate the eye strain, thereby ensuring ongoing participant safety and ethical compliance.
Key points:
- Seek feedback from participants during debriefing.
- Apply the principle of adjusting study procedures.
- Modify or stop the visual task to prevent further headaches.
- Ensure participant safety.
Rubric: Full credit requires applying the concepts of seeking debriefing feedback and adjusting the specific study procedures (the visual task) to resolve the unexpected harm.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Example: Baumrind's Criticism of Milgram's Study
Baumrind's Criticism of Milgram's Study
What action must investigators be prepared to take if participants exhibit unexpected distress or negative responses during an ongoing research study?
Arrange the following steps in the correct order for a researcher to ethically manage unanticipated participant reactions during an ongoing psychological study.
A researcher is conducting a study on the relationship between social media use and mood. Match each unanticipated participant reaction observed during the study with the most appropriate ethical action required by the principle of monitoring and safety.
In a psychological study where participants exhibit negative reactions that were not anticipated in the planning phase, the ethical principle of monitoring requires the researcher to prioritize the evaluation of procedural adjustments over the continued adherence to the original research protocol.
Match each term related to participant safety with its correct definition based on ethical standards for psychological research.
Which of the following best explains why researchers must continuously monitor participants for unanticipated negative reactions during an active psychology study, even if the research protocol was already ethically approved?
When evaluating the ethical integrity of an ongoing experiment, a researcher's decision to strictly adhere to the original protocol despite unanticipated participant distress is judged deficient because investigators are required to _____ the study's procedures to protect participant safety.
A cognitive psychologist conducting a memory study notices that several participants become highly frustrated and tearful when they cannot recall words. Because this specific distress was not anticipated in the approved study protocol, the investigator is ethically required to continue the study without making any changes to the procedures until all scheduled participants have completed the session.
When participants exhibit unexpected distress during an ongoing research study, investigators must analyze the situation by seeking participant feedback during the _____, which helps them determine how to adjust procedures for safety and ethical compliance.
Evaluate the ethical management of unanticipated participant reactions in an ongoing study by ordering the following steps from the initial monitoring phase to the final corrective action.
Describe the core responsibilities of investigators when participants exhibit unexpected distress or negative responses during an ongoing research study.
Based on ethical guidelines for monitoring participants, explain what Dr. Aris should understand about this situation and what actions must be taken.
A researcher notices that a newly implemented visual task is causing participants unexpected eye strain and severe headaches. How should the researcher apply ethical guidelines regarding unanticipated reactions to address this specific issue?